LGBTQ Doesn’t Allow For Diversity Of Thought Or Show Tolerance Even Among Fellow LGBTQ’ers • Now The End Begins

“For a group of people to claim to want tolerance, acceptance, and give it to every single person you can imagine to give it to, for them to sit back and judge me for exercising my right as an American to choose my leader without judgment is hypocritical,” Talbert said.

An LGBTQ group says ‘Charlotte Pride’ is pushing them out of the Gay Pride Parade because they support President Trump.

EDITOR’S NOTE: The LGBTQ has a socio-political agenda, and if you don’t follow it, even if you are a professing LGBTQ’er, you are kicked to the curb because you dared to hold an opposing point of view. Such is the case with Brian Talbert, a gay Trump supporter. The LGBTQ is not tolerant, is not diverse, and will ostracize anyone and everyone who does not walk in lockstep with their agenda. Even if you’re gay. They truly are a mafia, the LGBTQ mafia.

“I’m very proud of my country, proud of my president, and was once proud of my community,” said Brian Talbert, who said he’s proud to be gay and proud to be a Trump supporter. His truck has a Trump-Pence bumper sticker and ‘Not a liberal’ sign on the back window.

“I’m very proud of my vote. I don’t regret my vote. I will vote for Donald Trump again. I’m proud of my president. I don’t think I should be vilified because I’m proud of a U.S. president as an American.”

Talbert said he and a fellow gay Trump supporter sent in an application to Charlotte Pride so they could have a float in this year’s Charlotte Pride Parade.

“It was going to be fun. We wanted to be energetic. We wanted to show that we weren’t the racist, bigot, misogynistic…We wanted to show that we are Americans, love our country and our president. We wanted to be there to celebrate gay pride. Everything fell into place except being able to celebrate who I am,” he said.

Talbert said Charlotte Pride sent him an email denying his application for a float.

“For a group of people to claim to want tolerance, acceptance, and give it to every single person you can imagine to give it to, for them to sit back and judge me for exercising my right as an American to choose my leader without judgment is hypocritical,” Talbert said.

A spokesperson for the organization said in written statement, “Charlotte Pride reserves the right to decline participation at our events to groups or organizations which do not reflect the mission, vision and values of our organization, as is acknowledged in our parade rules and regulations by all groups at the time of their parade application. In the past, we have made similar decisions to decline participation from other organizations espousing anti-LGBTQ religious or public policy stances.

Charlotte Pride envisions a world in which LGBTQ people are affirmed, respected and included in the full social and civic life of their local communities, free from fear of any discrimination, rejection, and prejudice.

Charlotte Pride invites all individuals, groups, organizations and causes which share our values to join our community’s celebration of the LGBTQ community, history, arts and culture during the Charlotte Pride Festival and Parade, Aug. 26-27, 2017.”

Talbert said, “I don’t judge them for how they vote. I believe men and women died to give us that right to choose our own leader. They don’t extend the same courtesy to me being a gay Republican.”

Talbert said he plans to file a lawsuit against Charlotte Pride for discrimination. Here’s the link to his ‘Deplorable Pride’ website: where he’s raising money for lawyer’s fees. source


Source: LGBTQ Doesn’t Allow For Diversity Of Thought Or Show Tolerance Even Among Fellow LGBTQ’ers • Now The End Begins


‘Beauty And The Beast’ Director Wants To ‘Rip Pages Out Of The Bible’ As He Defends Gay Character In Remake • Now The End Begins


During a 2012 interview with Passport Magazine, Beauty and the Beast director Bill Condon said that he wishes he could “rip pages out of the Bible” as soon as he arrives in a hotel room, though, to Condon’s disappointment, there are usually none available.

“And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.” Romans 1:27 (KJV)

EDITOR’S NOTE: Usually when we report on these types of things, we will receive emails from people berating us for saying that Hollywood has a very definite anti-Christian bias and agenda. But as you can see, Hollywood hates Christians, hates the Bible, and will do anything they can to promote the LGBTQP lifestyle as they are now doing in the latest Beauty And The Beast remake. The movie’s director wants to “rip the pages out of the Bible” whenever he checks into a hotel room as he travels. What does that tell you about the agenda of this movie?

“What is first thing you do when you get into a hotel room?” asked Passport Magazine, in a now-archived interview.

Source: ‘Beauty And The Beast’ Director Wants To ‘Rip Pages Out Of The Bible’ As He Defends Gay Character In Remake • Now The End Begins

The Media’s New Champion: Radical Transgender Activists


Have you heard about the Toni the Tampon who teaches children that men can get periods too? Or about the mother and son who are about to become father and daughter, or about the transgender pastor who teaches that God is transgender?
This morning, as I was planning to write this very article, I received three emails from three different friends in three different parts of the country, all with links to different news headlines on major news websites, all with one theme in common: radical transgender activism.
You see, this is something that is knocking at our doors, not something we went looking for. This is something being reported in the NY Post and the Daily Mail, which are major news outlets, albeit with a touch of sensationalism.

Source: The Media’s New Champion: Radical Transgender Activists

LIBERAL INSANITY: New Book ‘Toni The Tampon’ Teaches Children That Men Can Menstruate • Now The End Begins



EDITOR’S NOTE: No words…speechless…bereft of speech. But suffice to say that this insanity, this clear-cut fundamental lunacy is indeed the actual platform of the new Democratic Left. Don’t like your gender? Pick a new one, or better yet, create a new one. Same-sex marriage? Sure! But don’t stop there, let’s add animals and inanimate objects. Bored with your life? Simply “identify” with something else, as someone else, as anything else, and  the LGBTQP will demand protect for it as your “human rights”. 

Cass Clemmer, the author of The Adventures of Toni the Tampon, has been using her coloring book character to “destigmatize” menstruation. Now, however, she also wants to “de-gender” the female biological process and to persuade children that men get periods too.

Clemmer’s latest adventure of Toni the Tampon is one aspect of the progressive campaign to blur the differences between male and female, and to ultimately create a “genderless” society which bars the commonplace civic distinctions between biological males and biological females in a heterosexual society.

Source: LIBERAL INSANITY: New Book ‘Toni The Tampon’ Teaches Children That Men Can Menstruate • Now The End Begins

The Freedom Two-fer: An Attack on Religion and Speech


By John Stonestreet/ October 03, 2016

Share this article:

Joanna Duka and Breanna Koski met at a Starbucks café in north Phoenix in January 2015. Both were Christians, and both were artists.

They decided to go into business together, combining their love for Jesus with their love for making beautiful things. Soon they launched Brush & Nib Studio, a for-profit art business that sells hand-drawn invitations and paintings.

According to the Alliance Defending Freedom, a leading Christian legal-defense organization, “As Christian artists, Joanna and Breanna had a simple goal for their studio: to recreate the beauty God placed all around us and to share that beauty with others. And this goal made it natural for Joanna and Breanna to focus on artwork for weddings.”

Well, this combination of Brush & Nib’s Christian conviction and its focus on weddings created a problem for Joanna and Breanna–as it already has for bakers and wedding photographers who believe marriage is between a man and a woman and cannot, by conscience, participate in wedding ceremonies between homosexuals.

The city of Phoenix has passed an ordinance which, according to ADF, “requires Brush & Nib to create invitations and other artwork for same-sex wedding ceremonies. It also prevented Brush & Nib from explaining to customers and the public why they could only create art consistent with their beliefs about marriage.”

This is what’s known in some circles as a two-fer, violating not only their religious freedom but also their freedom of speech! Not only that, but the law said that for each day business owners such as Joanna and Breanna were in violation, they would be liable for a $2,500 fine … and six months in jail.

These two Christians face fines and jail for standing up for what they believe. At the same time, no one would think of the government penalizing NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick for standing up–or in his case, not standing up–for what he believes. Why the inconsistency?

Phoenix is just the latest city to enact a “human rights” ordinance that is, in effect if not intent, marginalizing Christian citizens from living out their deeply held beliefs in the public square, forcing them to consent to the new sexual orthodoxy, not only in deed, but now also in word.

It’s only been five years since President Obama publicly changed his mind and announced his support for “gay marriage.” It’s only been a little over two years since then-Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer, bowed to blackmail from the National Football League and vetoed SB 1062, which would have protected Joanna and Breanna from being forced to violate their convictions.

In case there’s any remaining doubt, this is not just another random, isolated event.  As the recent comments by Martin Castro of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights reveal, religious freedom is no longer considered a good thing but instead code language for hate.

“The phrases ‘religious liberty’ and ‘religious freedom,'” he wrote, “will stand for nothing except hypocrisy so long as they remain code words for discrimination, intolerance, racism, sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia or any form of intolerance.”

Such contempt for religious liberty is growing. In the case of Joanna and Breanna, Judge Karen Mullins of the Superior Court in Maricopa County denied their request for a preliminary injunction against the Phoenix ordinance, calling their position “absurd.”

Jonathan Scruggs of ADF, which is representing Joanna and Breanna, replied, “Artists shouldn’t be threatened with jail time and other penalties simply for making art that is consistent with their beliefs.”

Joanna and Breanna are considering an appeal. They deserve our prayers. And groups defending our most precious freedom–groups like Alliance Defending Freedom–deserve our support.

Originally published at – reposted with permission.


Conspiracies Abound: Will Obama Try To Stay In Office If Donald Trump Wins?


By Michael Snyder – End of The America Dream Blog

August 08, 2016

Share this article:

If Donald Trump wins in November, will Barack Obama leave office and hand over power in an orderly fashion? Normally we would not even have to ask such a question, but these are not normal times. This week, Obama publicly stated that Trump “is unfit to serve as President” and that he is “woefully unprepared to do this job”.

In addition, he told the press that Trump “doesn’t have the judgment, the temperament, the understanding to occupy the most powerful position in the world.” If Obama really believes those things are true, would he really just stand aside and hand the keys to the White House to Trump?

Never before have I ever heard a sitting president claim that one of the major party candidates could not function as president. But that is what Obama has just done. The following is an excerpt from a transcript of remarks made by Obama earlier this week that comes directly from the official White House website. I want you to truly consider the implications of what he is saying here…


“But there have been Republican Presidents with whom I disagreed with, but I didn’t have a doubt that they could function as President. I think I was right, and Mitt Romney and John McCain were wrong on certain policy issues, but I never thought that they couldn’t do the job. And had they won, I would have been disappointed, but I would have said to all Americans they are — this is our President, and I know they’re going to abide by certain norms and rules and common sense, will observe basic decency, will have enough knowledge about economic policy and foreign policy and our constitutional traditions and rule of law that our government will work, and then we’ll compete four years from now to try to win an election. But that’s not the situation here. And that’s not just my opinion; that is the opinion of many prominent Republicans. There has to come a point at which you say, enough.”

Earlier today, I came across an outstanding article by Joseph Farah of WND in which he summarized the claims that Obama was making against Trump…

– He said Trump would not abide by “norms and rules and common sense.”

– He questioned whether he would “observe basic decency” should he reach the Oval Office.

– He said he would have been disappointed to lose the elections of 2008 and 2012, but never doubted whether his rivals in those elections, John McCain and Mitt Romney, could function as president or had the knowledge to make government work. “That’s not the situation here,” he added.

– He added Trump “doesn’t have the judgment, the temperament, the understanding, to occupy the most powerful position in the world.”

– He said he was “woefully unprepared to do this job.”

– Obama said Trump lacked knowledge about Europe, the Middle East and other parts of Asia.

This is some extremely strong language, and I truly wish one of the reporters at the press conference would have asked one incredibly important follow up question.

Will Barack Obama try to stay in office if Donald Trump wins the election?

In his article, Joseph Farah raised the same issue…

If no one else will ask the question, I will: “Mr. President, if Donald Trump wins the election to become the next president of the United States, will you willingly and peacefully leave office and cooperate fully with the transition of power the way all of your predecessors in the White House have done in the past?”

It’s a simple question that needs to be asked and answered – given Obama’s highly inflammatory rhetoric over the last week.

Like Farah, I believe that it is a fair question.

If Barack Obama truly believes all of the things he said about Donald Trump, does he also believe that he has a responsibility to keep Donald Trump from taking office?

Absent a major national emergency of some sort, this would be very difficult for Obama to do. But if there were some sort of enormous national crisis between now and next January, Barack Obama could potentially employ some of the extraordinary emergency powers that have been endowed on the office of the president over the past several decades.

There is not a single statute, regulation, executive order or presidential directive that contains all of the powers that a president would possess during a major national emergency. Rather, these powers have been layered on top of one another for a very long period of time, and they come from literally dozens of different laws, regulations, court decisions, executive orders and presidential directives.

One document that I would refer you to is National Security Presidential Directive 51 which was put into effect during the Bush administration. It is all about “national continuity policy” and it defines a “catastrophic emergency” as “any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions”.

In such a scenario, the president would have almost unlimited power, and he would wield enormously powerful executive orders such as this one. If there was a big enough emergency, the president would potentially be able to declare martial law, suspend elections and essentially become a dictator.

Let us hope that we never see such a thing play out in the United States of America.

On the other-hand, the alternative to Donald Trump, America and the world will be placed in the hand of this lady:

Still not convinced yet? Please watch the following Dinesh D’ movie:

Whatever the outcome of the November 2016 US presidential election, we have to remember this truth that God is in control and established or dethroned kings (rulers).





By Tom Olago June 03, 2016

Share this article:

Just when it seemed like the transgender bathroom and identification circus couldn’t possibly get worse, something happens to show that the box of surprises is still far from empty. How about a $60,000 payday for a perceived gender misnomer? Not too shabby – and certainly no shortage of folk who could get used to this.

A recent Christian News Network report by Heather Clark highlighted the story of a female elementary school teacher who says she neither identifies as male nor female. She has now been awarded a $60,000 settlement with her school district after she lodged a complaint that her co-workers continued to refer to her as a woman and wouldn’t call her “they.”

The 25-year-old teacher at Hall Elementary School, who now goes by the name Leo Soell, had told her friends in 2013 that she did not feel that she identified as either male or female. However, she did not reveal her feelings to her employers with the Gresham-Barlow School District, who continued to refer to her by her female name and pronoun.

As Clark further expounded, in November of the following year, Soell was diagnosed with breast cancer. After obtaining a mastectomy and reconstructive surgery to make her chest look more masculine, Soell approached the district to advise that she had changed her name to Leo as she identified as “genderqueer” or “transmasculine,” and desired to be referred to as “they.”

In Soell’s complaint, she alleged that teachers continued to refer to her as “she” or “Miss Soell,” and some called her a lady. So she and a teacher’s union filed a grievance and the district hired a transgender advocacy group to provide training for teachers.

But Soell says that some teachers continued to refuse to call her “they” in front of parents and children, and one “berated” a child who corrected a teacher for using the pronoun “she.” She also claims that teachers suddenly began using the gender-neutral restroom, which made her wait longer to be able to use the lavatory.

The district launched an investigation into Soell’s complaint but did not find any evidence of harassment. Therefore, Soell hired an attorney, who informed the district of their intent to file a complaint with the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries. The district then suggested a settlement.

According to The Oregonian, the agreement includes a $60,000 payment to Soell for emotional distress and attorney’s fees. Officials also agreed to make gender -neutral restrooms available at all schools within the district. Hall Elementary School now has only gender neutral restrooms, and teachers are required to call Soell “they” under the threat of discipline or dismissal.

“So people can basically force us–on pain of massive legal liability–to say what they want us to say, whether or not we want to endorse the political message associated with that term, and whether or not we think it’s a lie,” attorney Eugene Volokh recently wrote for the Washington Post in decrying a newly-established transgender law in New York City.

“We have to call people ‘him’ or ‘her’ even if we believe that people’s genders are determined by their biological sex and not by their self-perceptions–perceptions that, by the way, can rapidly change, for those who are ‘gender-fluid’–and that using terms tied to self-perception is basically a lie,” he said.

A report by Ben Kew published by on the same story quoted Soell after the settlement: “I actually feel safe now. There will always be people who push the boundaries, but I’m not worried about them anymore because I know that my district supports me.”

The school’s principal, Heidi Lasher, also reportedly emailed staff to instruct that the new policies “require that all staff address transgender or gender non-conforming employees with their correct name and pronouns.”

Then followed the unveiled threat: “If you are found to be in violation of these policies, you will be subject to discipline up to and including dismissal,” she added.

Not surprisingly, these developments have created an uproar in the  Christian Community – which firmly holds to the Biblical order that states God created only two genders:  “So God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He him; male and female created He them”(Genesis 1:27).

A Christian Post account by Stoyan Zaimov reported on Franklin Graham’s consternation in regard to the incident and subsequent settlement to Soell. Graham, head of international relief organization Samaritan’s Purse and son of famous Evangelist Billy Graham, stated:

“Doesn’t a person’s DNA or birth certificate count for anything? Shouldn’t fact override fantasy? God created people male and female,” Graham said in his recent Facebook post. Graham, who is also CEO of the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association described the email warning as “incredible,” and asked what the “correct” pronouns are.

Graham has spoken out about a number of transgender issues in America in recent times, such as the conservative boycott against chain store giant Target over its new bathroom policies that allow people to use the restroom of their choosing.

Target has suffered plunging stock prices and loss in consumer support ever since the boycott began, though CEO Brian Cornell made a comment denying that the boycott is the reason for the company’s financial troubles. Graham responded to the comment by arguing that Cornell is in “denial.”

“Really? He must be in denial. Wake up corporate America and stockholders — American families clearly do not want this. Over 1.2 million people have signed the online petition to boycott Target stores. This is sending a strong message, and I hope that millions more will sign it,” he wrote, referring to a petition against Target’s new policies started by the American Family Association (AFA).

The AFA has warned that in its bid to be more inclusive, Target is putting women in danger.”This means a man can simply say he ‘feels like a woman today’ and enter the women’s restroom … even if young girls or women are already in there. Target’s policy is exactly how sexual predators get access to their victims. And with Target publicly boasting that men can enter women’s bathrooms, where do you think predators are going to go?” the conservative group asked.

Those who think that there are only three or four genders to worry about should have woken up and smelled the coffee at least two years ago – and perhaps much earlier than that. What’s coming out publicly now is seemingly just the tip of the iceberg.

In an article for the UK Telegraph in June of 2014, Rhiannon Williams reported:

“UK Facebook users can now choose from one of 71 gender options, including asexual, polygender and two-spirit person, following the feature’s successful integration in the US.

Users can choose a different gender option from the previous male and female choices by selecting ‘custom’ in the gender tab of their profiles. In addition, people who select a custom gender will now have the ability to choose the pronoun they’d like to be referred to publicly — male (he/his), female (she/her) or neutral (they/their).

Professor Stephen Whittle, vice-president at Press for Change was quoted as saying then that “…By challenging the gender binary, Facebook will finally allow thousands of people to describe themselves as they are now and it will allow future generations of kids to become truly comfortable in their own skins.”

Currently, Facebook targets advertising to users based on their gender. If a user chooses an option other than male or female, then advertisements will be selected based on the pronoun they choose to be mentioned with.

Other websites have already implemented similar policies as transgender issues became more widely considered. Google+, for instance, allows users to choose from “male”, “female” or “other”. The company says that around one per cent of people identify as “other”.